At last we come to the final confrontation in this series on story structure. The hero has battled his inner demons and emerged with new determination, new prowess, new strength to face the opposition for the final time.
When I say “new strength” I do not mean to suggest that the hero should come to the final battle refreshed, healed, confident. Many times he will come limping and convinced of his own impending defeat, but he comes with the knowledge that he now has something he didn’t have before he faced himself down at the second plot point.
What do we need now for a successful resolution? I believe it was writer Larry Brooks who said it this way: the stakes of the story are paid and the reader’s emotional experience concluded. Notice nothing in there says the hero wins/loses and gets his happy/unhappy ending.
The stakes of the story are paid. This is prime Donald Maass territory. The questions he puts forth in The Writing the Breakout Novel Workbook and The Fire In Fiction really open up this issue and start poking around in the entrails. (Who else is going to give you that imagery, my fellows?) Has there been a sacrifice to preserve what is at stake? Has it cost the hero enough? Have there been costs for the innocent? Who must be forgiven, and who can forgive?
Can the hero fail to attain his goal? What would that look like? What would be utterly lost? What would be partially lost? What might not be lost but changed? Does the debris of defeat settle to reveal an unforeseen alternate path of resolution?
Foremost among all these considerations is this: is the hero the primary catalyst for the story resolution?
If not…why is he the hero?
All things, even the hero, must come full circle, concluding the emotional experience presented for the reader.
***
And on a final note, if you guys head over to my Unsafe Haven blog, you'll find a fun post on songs I would choose for my WIP's soundtrack. It's part of the What's the Score Blogfest. Check it out.
I started reading Dis last night! I'm so excited! You've got a wonderful voice, Margo.
ReplyDeleteI had planned to finish it but I'd spent all night reading and finishing Across the Universe by Beth Revis and while it has a fantastic resolution, it is not a happy one. I was kind of emotionally drained after getting through it.
"Is the hero the primary catalyst for the story resolution? If not...why is he the hero?"
ReplyDeleteYep, pretty much.
Hope you are feeling better.
Hi, Sommer. I'm glad you're enjoying "Dis" so far. It was probably the right decision to recharge before finishing it. I've been told by my betas that it's not a quick, light read. It requires a bit of active reading. My English-major beta said it was the literary quality to the writing that did it. I guess I can't quite get away from my days writing literary fiction, but I do like a touch of it. :)
ReplyDeleteHi, LG. Feeling quite a bit better, though hopelessly off-kilter after receiving several bits of big news in the last few days (from death in the family to a medical diagnosis that's going to require more surgery).
Regarding the hero and the story resolution...you know what really catches me? Donald Maass got me with this one more than once. Why is your hero the oly one who can solve this problem? Umm... well... er... uh...
I think I recall reading that question in one of his books and having the same flat footed sort of response. I love the way Maass makes me ponder things I hadn't previously considered.
ReplyDeleteI love what you point out about the main character as catalyst for the resolution and the attention to concluding the emotional experience for the reader. It takes a lot of craft and mental / emotional awareness to do this well.
ReplyDeleteWhen I don't like a novel, this is often the problem: a lack of emotional engagement and believability. The 'oh, come on!' feeling.
Hi, LG. You mentioned cognitive dissonance on your blog. Donald is cognitive dissonance personified!
ReplyDeleteHi, KC. I agree 110% - that constant level of awareness (great way to put it) is very important in my own writing. Lately the thing that's been turning me off in novels is the main characters who are leaves in the wind, don't contribute to the complications, aren't the catalysts for anything going on in the story, and are in fact the main characters for no particular reason.
Hey! KC, you write fantasy set in the Cotswalds? I lived in Cheltenham for awhile back in the 90's!
ReplyDelete